Publications

The following is a list of Dr. Harman's publications related to the topic of parental alienation. For information on research published by other scientists in this area, please visit the Parental Alienation Study Group.

Peer-reviewed Publications

Harman, J. J., Matthewson, M. L., & Baker, A. J. L. (2022). Losses experienced by children alienated from a parent. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.05.002

This review paper discusses the empirical research supporting the processes involved with the alienation of a child from a safe and "good enough" parent. Parental alienating behaviors lead to a corruption of the child's reality, undermining their positive and living memories of a parent, leading to a cascade of losses that the child is required to suffer, alone.

Harman, J. J., Maniotes, C. R., & Grubb, C. (2021). Power dynamics in families affected by parental alienation. Personal Relationships. https//doi.org/ 10.1111/pere.12392

This study examined power dynamics in families, as described by parents who had been alienated from a child by the other parent. The situations described by the parents were characterized by large power imbalances, such that the alienating parent had most, if not all the power in the family dynamic, through custody, decision-making, and the child's allegiance. Consequently, families affected by parental alienation reflect the same power dynamics found in families where coercively controlling abuse is occurring rather than situational couple violence.

Harman, J. J., & Lorandos, D. (2021). Allegations of family violence in court: How parental alienation affects judicial outcomes. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law. 27, 184-208. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000301

This study tested the findings reported by Meier et al. (2019) using a transparent and methodologically rigorous research design. The study was designed to remedy/address the 30+ methodological and statistical flaws of the Meier et al. study. Across 967 U.S. appellate court cases where parental alienation had been found or alleged, less than half of the cases involved any allegations of abuse. In addition, parents found (not alleged) to have alienated a child from their other parent for illegitimate or exaggerated reasons were more likely to lose custody and parenting time than parents who were only alleged (accused) of having alienated their children, regardless of gender. This article is openly accessible.

Harman, J. J., Lorandos, D., Biringen, Z., & Grubb, C. (2020). Gender differences in the use of parental alienating behaviors. Journal of Family Violence, 35, 459-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00097-5

This paper reports on findings from two studies testing the hypothesis that there would be gender differences in the use of parental alienating behaviors, just as aggression researchers have documented for other forms of violence. Results from interviews with alienated parents and appellate court cases where parental alienation had occurred indicated support for the hypothesis: Mothers used twice as many indirect aggression strategies (e.g., derogation to others, false allegations of abuse, loyalty inducing behaviors) than direct strategies (e.g., provoking the other parent at parenting time exchanges), while fathers used similar levels of both strategies.

Harman, J. J., Leder-Elder, S., & Biringen, Z. (2019). Prevalence of adults who are the targets of parental alienating behaviors and their impact: Results from three national polls. Child & Youth Services Review, 106, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104471

This paper presents the results of three national polls (2 from the U.S., 1 from Canada) to assess the prevalence of parental alienating behaviors and consequences. Survey panels were created by Qualtrics to reflect the demographics of the adult population so that the findings could be generalized to the national population. Results indicated that over 6.7% of the general population of adults are the nonreciprocating target of parental alienating behaviors (~22 million in the U.S.), and that over 1.3% of these parents were moderately to severely alienated from a child, which is 3 times as many children as have autism in the U.S. Alienated parents were more likely to have symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and were more likely to have considered suicide in the last year due to custody problems than other divorced parents who were not alienated from their child.

Harman, J. J., Bernet, W., & Harman, J. (2019). Parental alienation: The blossoming of a field of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419827271

This review paper highlights what is known about parental alienation from the published research to date and demonstrates that the research is generative and has developed past a descriptive, early stage of development to one of more complex theoretical development and relationship testing.

Harman, J. J., Kruk, E., & Hines, D. (2018). Parental alienating behaviors: An unacknowledged form of family violence. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 1275-1299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000175

This review of the published research on parental alienation and the alienating behaviors that cause it indicates that this is a form of family violence that includes both child abuse and domestic violence.

Smith, A. D., Biringen, Z., & Harman, J. J. (2018). Parenting time and child coping: The context of parental alienation. Family Science Review, 23, 118-140.

This study of alienated parents found that the more alienating parents violated parenting time orders and restricted their child's time with the alienated parent, the worse the outcomes for the children.

Harman, J. J., Biringen, Z., Ratajack, E. M., Outland, P. L., & Kraus, A. (2016). Parents behaving badly: Gender biases in the perception of parental alienation. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 866-874. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000232

This experimental study examined parent's perceptions of parental alienating behaviors, such that they rated how acceptable they perceived the behaviors as being. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions where they were prompted with three different instructions: whether the alienating behaviors were perpetrated by a mother, a father, or a generic parent. While participants rated parental alienating behaviors as being unacceptable overall, they were rated as more acceptable for mothers to do than fathers or generic parents. This gender difference in rating possibly reflects gender biases that mothers must have a "reason" to harm their children in this way to protect them (i.e. "dads are abusive"), while fathers and generic parents are not given this "pass."

Harman, J. J., Leder-Elder, S. & Biringen, Z. (2016). Prevalence of parental alienation drawn from a representative poll. Children & Youth Services Review, 66, 62-66. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.04.021

This study was a brief telephone (cell phone, landlines) poll of a representative sample of North Carolina, US adults to obtain an initial estimate of the numbers of parents who felt they were being alienated from their child(ren) by their child's other parent. It was estimated that approximately 22 million adults believe they are being alienated from their children based on the results of this poll.

Biringen, Z., Closson, L., Derr-Moore, A., Hall, A., Pybus, K., Saunders, H., Warren, V., Lucas-Thompson, R., Harman, J. J., & Neu, M. (2015). Mindfulness, emotional availability, and emotional attachment: Three pillars of daily practice. Zero to Three Journal, 36, 20-26.

This paper considered the applicability of the emotional availability framework to understanding parental alienation cases. Given that alienated children reject a parent for reasons that are not legitimate, the emotional availability of a parent cannot, on its own, repair the attachment with a child, as the process involves availability on both sides of the relational dynamic.

Books, Book chapters, and Encyclopedia Entries

Harman, J. J., & Kruk, E. (in press). The same coin: Intimate partner violence, child abuse, and parental alienation. In B. Russell & J. Hamel (Eds), Beyond the Gender Paradigm: A Legal Primer on Evidence-Based Criminal Justice Approaches to Intimate Partner Violence. Oxford University Press.

This chapter reviews the research on coercively controlling abuse related to the use of children as weapons against the target of abuse, and demonstrates that the parental alienating behaviors are just another label/term for the same phenomenon. The chapter also discusses how a gender paradigm about domestic violence that promotes the idea that women cannot be perpetrators of abuse (e.g., they only use aggression in self-defense) has created conflict and a false controversy about the concept of parental alienation.

Harman, J. J., & Prosser, J. L. (in press). Parental alienation. Routledge Encyclopedia of Psychology in the Real World.

This encyclopedia entry details what parental alienation is and what it is not.

Harman, J. J., & Matthewson, M. (2020). Parental alienating behaviors. In D. Lorandos and W. Bernet (Eds.), Parental Alienation- Science and Law, pp. 82-141. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.

This chapter reviews the research documenting parental alienating behaviors perpetrated by a parent to harm the child's relationship with their other parent. The behaviors are mapped onto a modified "power and control wheel" that is used in the education and treatment for coercively controlling abuse. The authors also described sources of data that can be used to document and demonstrate the parental alienating behaviors for forensic purposes.

Harman, J. J., & Biringen, Z. (2016). Parents acting badly: How institutions and societies promote the alienation of children from their loving families. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado Parental Alienation Project, LLC.

This book reviews research on parental alienation, and describes how institutions (e.g., family court, child protection services) and cultural norms and shifts have contributed to the problem.